- The defender of abortion legality (called "Pro-Choice") will admit that the debate hinges upon when an individual human life begins.
- However, he/she will assert that this knowledge is totally obscure, subjective, and unknowable.
- Thus, he/she concludes abortion should remain legal.
In fact, that is the very logic used in Roe vs Wade when the court decided upon a constitution right to abortion. Justice Blackmun wrote:
"When those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy, and theology are unable to arrive at any consensus, the judiciary, at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer."So that's what I want to look at today. Is this really the case? Or are folks just trying to deny an inconvenient truth?