Paul’s first letter to the Corinthians has two sections which affect the way we receive communion today. One is in the 11th chapter, where Paul warns his readers that receiving communion is a dangerous affair. He says:
“Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. Examine yourselves, and only then eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For all who eat and drink without discerning the body, eat and drink judgment against themselves. For this reason many of you are weak and ill, and some have died.” – 1 Corinthians 11:27-30
The other is in the
5th chapter, where Paul chastises them for maintaining fellowship with a man in a public incestuous relationship. Did they want outsiders to think the Church approved of that kind of nonsense?
This has led the Catholic Church to two conclusions. First, a person who knows he’s guilty of mortal sin should personally abstain from receiving communion. This is found in the Code of Canon Law section 916.
“A person who is conscious of grave sin is not to receive the body of the Lord without sacramental confession.”
The second conclusion is that if a person publicly persists in grave sin, that person should be refused communion. In other words, it goes beyond a person examining himself and deciding not to receive. folks are obliged to say “no” when such a person presents himself for Communion. This is found in Canon 915.
“Those who are obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to Holy Communion.”
One of the most common objections to this practice centers on Judas’ presence at the Last Supper. It goes like this:
“If Jesus would give Communion to Judas, what right does the Church have to deny it to me?”
That’s what I want to look at today.